Keratoconjunctivitis sicca is chronic, bilateral desiccation of the conjunctiva and cornea due to an inadequate tear film. Symptoms include itching, burning, irritation, and photophobia. Diagnosis is clinical; the Schirmer test may be helpful. Treatment is with topical tear supplements and sometimes blockage of the nasolacrimal openings.
There are 2 main types:
Aqueous tear-deficient keratoconjunctivitis sicca is most commonly an isolated idiopathic condition in postmenopausal women. It is also commonly part of Sjögren syndrome (see Sjögren Syndrome (SS)), RA, or SLE. Less commonly, it is secondary to other conditions that scar the lacrimal ducts (eg, cicatricial pemphigoid, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, trachoma). It may result from a damaged or malfunctioning lacrimal gland due to graft-vs-host disease, HIV (diffuse infiltrative lymphocytosis syndrome), local radiation therapy, or familial dysautonomia.
Evaporative keratoconjunctivitis sicca is caused by loss of the tear film due to abnormally rapid evaporation caused by an inadequate oil layer on the surface of the aqueous layer of tears. Symptoms may result from abnormal oil quality (ie, meibomian gland dysfunction) or a degraded normal oil layer (ie, seborrheic blepharitis). Patients frequently have acne rosacea.
Drying can also result from exposure due to inadequate eye closure at night (nocturnal lagophthalmos or Bell or facial nerve palsy) or from inadequate frequency of reapplication of tears to the cornea due to an insufficient blink rate (eg, in Parkinson disease).
Symptoms and Signs
Patients report itching; burning; a gritty, pulling, or foreign body sensation; or photosensitivity. A sharp stabbing pain, eye strain or fatigue, and blurred vision may also occur. Some patients note a flood of tears after severe irritation. Typically, symptoms fluctuate in intensity and are intermittent. Certain factors can worsen symptoms:
Symptoms lessen on cool, rainy, or foggy days or in other high-humidity environments, such as in the shower. Recurrent and prolonged blurring and frequent intense irritation can impair daily function. However, permanent impairment of vision is rare.
With both forms, the conjunctiva is hyperemic, and there is often scattered, fine, punctate loss of corneal epithelium (superficial punctate keratitis), conjunctival epithelium, or both. When the condition is severe, the involved areas, mainly between the eyelids (the intrapalpebral or exposure zone), stain with fluorescein. Patients often blink at an accelerated rate because of irritation.
With the aqueous tear-deficient form, the conjunctiva can appear dry and lusterless with redundant folds. With the evaporative form, abundant tears may be present as well as foam at the eyelid margin. Very rarely, severe, advanced, chronic drying leads to significant vision loss due to keratinization of the ocular surface or loss of corneal epithelium, leading to sequelae such as scarring, neovascularization, infections, ulceration, and perforation.
Diagnosis is based on characteristic symptoms and clinical appearance. The Schirmer test and tear breakup test may differentiate type.
The Schirmer test determines whether tear production is normal. After blotting the closed eye to remove excess tears, a strip of filter paper is placed, without topical anesthesia, at the junction of the middle and lateral third of the lower eyelid. If < 5.5 mm of wetting occurs after 5 min on 2 successive occasions, the patient has aqueous tear-deficient keratoconjunctivitis sicca.
With evaporative keratoconjunctivitis sicca, the Schirmer test is usually normal. The tear film can be made visible under cobalt blue light at the slit lamp by instillation of a small volume of highly concentrated fluorescein (made by wetting a fluorescein strip with saline and shaking the strip to remove any excess moisture). Blinking several times reapplies a complete tear film. The patient then stares, and the length of time until the first dry spot develops is determined (tear breakup test, or TBUT). An accelerated rate of intact tear film breakup (< 10 sec) is characteristic of evaporative keratoconjunctivitis sicca.
If aqueous tear-deficient keratoconjunctivitis sicca is diagnosed, Sjögren syndrome (see Sjögren Syndrome (SS)) should be suspected, especially if xerostomia is also present. Serologic tests and labial salivary gland biopsy are used for diagnosis. Patients with primary or secondary Sjögren syndrome are at increased risk of several serious diseases (eg, primary biliary cirrhosis, non-Hodgkin lymphoma). Therefore, proper evaluation and monitoring are essential.
Frequent use of artificial tears can be effective for both types. More viscous artificial tears coat the ocular surface longer, and artificial tears that contain polar lipids such as glycerin reduce evaporation; both types are particularly useful in evaporative keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Artificial tear ointments applied before sleep are particularly useful when patients have nocturnal lagophthalmos or irritation on waking. Most cases are treated adequately throughout the patient's life with such supplementation. Staying hydrated, using humidifiers, and avoiding dry, drafty environments can often help. Not smoking and avoiding secondary smoke are important. In recalcitrant cases, occlusion of the nasolacrimal punctum may be indicated. In severe cases, a partial tarsorrhaphy can reduce tear loss through evaporation. Topical cyclosporine and ω-3 fatty acid dietary supplements may be a useful adjunct in some patients.
Patients with evaporative keratoconjunctivitis sicca often benefit from treatment of concomitant blepharitis and associated rosacea with measures such as warm compresses and eyelid margin scrubs, and intermittent topical eyelid antibiotic ointments (eg, bacitracin at bedtime), systemic doxycycline 50 to 100 mg po once or twice/day (contraindicated in pregnant or nursing patients), or both.
Cyclosporine drops that decrease the inflammation associated with dryness of the eye are available. They lead to meaningful improvement but only in a fraction of patients. These drops sting and take months before an effect is noticed.
Last full review/revision October 2012 by Melvin I. Roat, MD, FACS
Content last modified October 2013