How To Repair a Laceration With Stapling

• Relatively straight, sharp-edged lacerations of the trunk or an extremity, and superficial lacerations of the scalp

Absolute contraindications

• Anticipated need for CT scan of area being repaired with staple because of potential for imaging artifacts

Relative contraindications

• Lacerations on the face or neck because the cosmetic result is often inferior to that with suturing

• Lacerations on hands or feet because pain is more often increased

• Anticipated head CT because tissue staples create scan artifact

• Patients who are not likely to return for staple removal

Wound closure of any type may be contraindicated for wounds that are contaminated, relatively old, or that would be at higher risk of infection if closed, such as small bites to hands or feet, puncture wounds, or high-velocity missile wounds.

Wounds involving deep structures (eg, nerves, blood vessels, ducts, joints, tendons, bones) may require specialized techniques or consultation by a surgical specialist, as should those covering large areas or involving the face or hands.

• Improper wound edge apposition leading to poor wound closure and cosmetic result

• In patients who scar easily, a larger scar

• Worse cosmetic effect, particularly if staples are left in too long

• Infection

Wound hygiene and closure are not required to be performed under sterile conditions (4, 5). Instruments that touch the wound (eg, forceps, needles, suture) must be sterile. Clean single-use nonsterile gloves as well as clean but not sterile water may be used in immunocompetent patients.

Clean procedure, barrier protection

• Appropriate personal protective equipment (eg, face mask, safety glasses or a face shield, head cap, gown, gloves)

• Sterile drapes, towels (for wound debridement and suturing)

• Antiseptic cleanser such as chlorhexidineAntiseptic cleanser such as chlorhexidine

• Syringes, needles, and local anesthesia

• Tissue forceps

• Stapling device (including removal device)

• Antibiotic ointment

• Nonocclusive dressing

• Suturing and stapling have comparable healing outcomes, wound tensile strength, complication rates, patient tolerance, efficiency of closure, scar width, color, general appearance, suture or staple marks, infection rates, cost, and patient acceptance (21, 22). In animal studies, staples had less wound inflammation and greater resistance to infection in contaminated wounds.

• The major advantage to using staples is faster time to close the wound.

• If wounds have significant underlying tension, place deep, absorbable sutures before stapling to decrease tension.

• Position the patient comfortably reclined or supine.

• Adjust the stretcher height so that you will be comfortable either sitting or standing at the bedside.

• The laceration should be well lit, preferably with an overhead procedure light.

(For step-by-step descriptions of wound preparation, anesthesia, and dressing, see How To Cleanse, Irrigate, Debride, and Dress Wounds.)

• Cleanse, anesthetize, irrigate, and debride the wound as necessary.

• Place a sterile fenestrated drape over the wound. Place additional drapes nearby as needed to provide a large enough sterile work area.

• Begin at one end of the laceration.

• Evert the edges of the wound using forceps, preferably done by a second operator. Sometimes, the skin can be everted simply by pinching it between the your thumb and forefinger.

• Once the edges are in eversion, gently place the staples across the wound.

• To ensure the best closure, place the center of the staple device perpendicular to and over the center of the wound.

• Once the stapler handle is squeezed, the staple is automatically placed into the wound and bent to the proper configuration. When placed properly, the crossbar of the staple is elevated a few millimeters above the surface of the skin.

• Work from one end of the laceration to the other, placing each staple approximately 0.5 to 1 cm from its predecessor, as needed to achieve proper apposition of the edges along the entire length of the wound.

• Apply antibiotic ointment if desired, then leave uncovered or cover with a sterile bandage.

• Have the patient remove the dressing and gently cleanse the wound in 24 to 48 hours. Scalp lacerations can be cleansed by showering within a few hours.

• Remove staples using the same time interval as sutures. (See How To Repair a Laceration With Simple Interrupted Sutures: Aftercare.) To remove staples, use a dedicated instrument made specifically by the manufacturer of that stapling device. Place the lower jaw of the staple remover under the crossbar and squeeze the handle.

• Improper wound edge apposition (causing wound edges to overlap) and failure to evert the wound edges are the most common errors. Align the middle of the staple with the center of the wound.

• Pressing too hard on the device when stapling can place the staples too tightly, causing wound ischemia.

• Removal of staples can be more uncomfortable than removal of sutures.

• Staples can cause significant scarring if left in place too long.

• Rather than starting at one end of the laceration, many health care professionals find it easier to start in the middle and then place subsequent staples in the middle of each open section, until there are no remaining gaps in the wound.

• If forceps are not available, the skin can be everted by pinching the skin (eg, with thumb and forefinger).

1. 1. Singer AJ, Hollander JE, Subramanian S, et al. Pressure dynamics of various irrigation techniques commonly used in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1994;24(1):36-40. doi:10.1016/s0196-0644(94)70159-8

2. 2. Fernandez R, Griffiths R. Water for wound cleansing. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(2):CD003861. Published 2012 Feb 15. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003861.pub3

3. 3. Baldwin G, Colbourne M. Puncture wounds. Pediatr Rev. 1999;20(1):21-23. doi:10.1542/pir.20-1-21

4. 4. Worrall GJ. Repairing skin lacerations: does sterile technique matter?. Can Fam Physician. 1987;33:1185-1187.

5. 5. Hollander JE, Singer AJ. Laceration management. Ann Emerg Med. 1999;34(3):356-367. doi:10.1016/s0196-0644(99)70131-9

6. 6. Singer AJ, Dagum AB. Current management of acute cutaneous wounds. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(10):1037-1046. doi:10.1056/NEJMra0707253.

7. 7. Tanner J, Melen K. Preoperative hair removal to reduce surgical site infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;8(8):CD004122. Published 2021 Aug 26. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004122.pub5

8. 8. Orlinsky M, Bright AA. The utility of routine x-rays in all glass-caused wounds. Am J Emerg Med. 2006;24(2):233-236. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2005.06.008

9. 9. Voss JO, Doll C, Raguse JD, et al. Detectability of foreign body materials using X-ray, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: A phantom study. Eur J Radiol. 2021;135:109505. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109505

10. 10. Davis J, Czerniski B, Au A, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasonography in Retained Soft Tissue Foreign Bodies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Acad Emerg Med. 2015;22(7):777-787. doi:10.1111/acem.12714

11. 11. Holman M. Using tap water compared with normal saline for cleansing wounds in adults: a literature review of the evidence. J Wound Care. 2023;32(8):507-512. doi:10.12968/jowc.2023.32.8.507

12. 12. Chisholm CD, Cordell WH, Rogers K, et al. Comparison of a new pressurized saline canister versus syringe irrigation for laceration cleansing in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1992;21(11):1364-1367. doi:10.1016/s0196-0644(05)81903-1

13. 13. Lammers RL, Hudson DL, Seaman ME. Prediction of traumatic wound infection with a neural network-derived decision model. Am J Emerg Med. 2003;21(1):1-7. doi:10.1053/ajem.2003.50026

14. 14. Mankowitz SL. Laceration Management. J Emerg Med. 2017;53(3):369-382. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.05.026.

15. 15. Eliya-Masamba MC, Banda GW. Primary closure versus delayed closure for non bite traumatic wounds within 24 hours post injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013(10):CD008574. Published 2013 Oct 22. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008574.pub3

16. 16. Mehta PH, Dunn KA, Bradfield JF, et al. Contaminated wounds: infection rates with subcutaneous sutures. Ann Emerg Med. 1996;27(1):43-48. doi:10.1016/s0196-0644(96)70295-0

17. 17. Bresnahan KA, Howell JM, Wizorek J. Comparison of tensile strength of cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive closure of lacerations versus suture closure. Ann Emerg Med. 1995;26(5):575-578. doi:10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70007-2

18. 18. Farion K, Osmond MH, Hartling L, et al. Tissue adhesives for traumatic lacerations in children and adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;2002(3):CD003326. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003326

19. 19. Carvalho C, Marinho AS, Barbosa-Sequeira J, et al. Pediatric Burns With Cyanoacrylate Glue: An Inconspicuous Danger. J Burn Care Res. 2021;42(5):1047-1049. doi:10.1093/jbcr/irab06

20. 20. Jacques M, Tran S, Bertinetti M, et al. Too Hot to Handle? Full-Thickness Burn Injury in a Child Caused by Cyanoacrylate Glue and Cotton-A Case Report and Experimental Study. J Burn Care Res 2021;42(3):564-568. doi:10.1093/jbcr/iraa174

21. 21. Shuster M. Comparing skin staples to sutures. Can Fam Physician. 1989;35:505-509.

22. 22. Edlich RF, Rodeheaver GT, Thacker JG, et al. Revolutionary advances in the management of traumatic wounds in the emergency department during the last 40 years: part II. J Emerg Med. 2010;38(2):201-207. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.11.016